price:higer than Dopod818,imate those are same spec stability:more stable than all other O2 PDA performance:Texas Int,195Mhz,low end processor(common is Intel 415Mhz),high stablities than intel processors. personal comments:I think that the major factos affect the stability is the processors.look all the PDA which are using Intel processors are all hell..try to think what i said.And the ATOM is the worst Pda i have used,reboot randomly,cant boot smoothly,lacks on using,etc.who intend to buy O2 products ,think before you regret.

i've had the neo for about 6 wks and it is so far excellent for my needs, having had the jasjar,jam,hp 6515,audiovox 6600, i-mate pda2, this has been the most stable pda/phone of them all!! pros: size,i-mate rom (allows more storage than i had with the jasjar),2 MP camera allows me to use for good res. in my medical practice!(i can now avoid a digital camera in my other pocket!),one-handed use with the pad is nearly the same as the ultimate sony jog wheels,screen display,mini-usb,min. soft resets(most stable wm 5.0,jasjar was essentially unuseable with addition of any software programs. cons:battery life is average(awaiting extended one),skype will not work,speaker on back. all in all a fantastic device for my needs...i may actually keep it longer than my previous record of 1.5 years with the samsung i700!!

I live in Canada (Toronto) and have used both the Atom and the Neo. I actually replaced the Atom with the Neo as the Neo has much better reception here than the Atom. I can be sitting a couple levels underground and still have almost full reception.. whereas the atom gets nothing. Phone ability to me is #1 so Neo wins here. The processing speed is ok. If you are someone who likes to jam pack your pda with every possible program than the Neo will probably not be your best choice. For me, I use it purely as a phone/organizer/presentation prep tool so I have the most minimal amount of programs and I do not feel the slow processor problem.